This morning’s New York Times reports that law schools around America are systematically inflating grades in order to make their graduates more appealing during this unprecedentedly bad job market. This development provides a definitive answer to the question that has, at one level or another, been on the mind of everyone in the legal industry: is there nobody at the helm? Are the so called leaders of this profession completely bereft of constructive thoughts for how to extricate us from this mess? The answer is apparently yes.
It doesn’t take a dean of a major American law school to figure out the flaw in this logic. If every school raises its average GPA by .33, then the national average will also go up by .33, and everyone’s back where they started. Aside from its futility, the aspect of this idea that is most irritating is simply how small minded it is. The nature of demand for legal services is changing – the writing is on the wall. Consumers want different kinds of services delivered in different ways for less money. An appropriate response from law schools would be to design curricula that teach students about things like law office technology, firm economics, unbundled services, legal process outsourcing, etc. An appropriate response from law schools would be to admit fewer students in the hopes that by lowering future supply in the labor market, the remaining supply might reunite with demand at a happy equilibrium. An appropriate response from law schools would be to convene a conference to deliberate the role and limitations of ethical restrictions in the modern economy.
In other words, there are lots of appropriate responses, but raising grades is not one of them. That is simply childish, and it evinces a serious vacuum in the thought leadership of the profession.
- Richard Komaiko

Tell a friend